Mutton, Meters. E., & Gilbride, K. In the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you may in conflict dating (pp. 33-60). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Detected similarity and you will dating victory certainly one of relationship people: An enthusiastic idiographic strategy

Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & More youthful, J. (2008). When the I am not sizzling hot, could you be sizzling hot or otherwise not?: Physical-elegance reviews and you will relationships tastes once the a purpose of an individual’s very own attractiveness. Mental Research, 19, 669677. [ Hyperlinks ]

Levinger, G., & Rands, M. (1985)patibility in marriage or any other personal relationships. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and in conflict relationship (pp. 309-331). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Amount of aspiration. Into the J. McV. See (Ed.), Identity additionally the conclusion disorders (Vol. step one, pp. 333378). Nyc: Ronald Force. [ Backlinks ]

Loving, T. J. (2006). Predicting relationship relationship destiny that have insiders’ and you can outsiders’ perspective: Who and what is questioned things. Personal Dating, 13, 349-362. [ Website links ]

Luo, S., & Klohnen, Age. C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital quality within the newly wedded couples: Several dependent method. Journal out of Identity and you will Social Therapy, 88, 304-326. [ Website links ]

Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, A. (2006). Online dating. Washington, DC: Statement toward Pew Internet & Western Lifestyle Investment. Retrieved , of [ Hyperlinks ]

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Meters. (1999). Determining the precision from forecasts regarding matchmaking dating: Just how and exactly why manage lovers’ predictions vary from people made by observers? Personality and you may Personal Mindset Bulletin, 25, 14171429. [ Website links ]

ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing affairs throughout the initiation away from heterosexual relationships. Paper displayed at the Very first Around the globe Conference to your Private Relationship, Madison, WI. [ Links ]

Merkle, Elizabeth.Roentgen., & Richardson, R.An excellent. (2000). Electronic matchmaking and you can digital relating: Conceptualizing computer system mediated romantic dating. Household members, forty two, 187-192. [ Links ]

Montoya, R. Meters., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is real resemblance necessary for destination? A meta-analysis regarding real and you can seen resemblance. Journal of Societal and private Relationship, twenty-five, 889-922. [ Backlinks ]

Morry, M. M. (2005). Relationships pleasure once the a beneficial predictor out-of similarity studies; A test of appeal-resemblance hypothesis. Diary off Social and personal Matchmaking, twenty two, 561-584. [ Backlinks ]

Record from Public and private Matchmaking, 23, 865-880

Morry, Yards. Meters. (2007). The fresh new interest-similarity theory certainly one of mix-sex household members: Relationships satisfaction, identified similarities, and care about-offering thinking. Log out of Personal and personal Matchmaking, 24, 117-138. [ Website links ]

Murstein, B. We. (1987). A clarification and expansion of your own SVR idea regarding dyadic pairing. Record off ily, forty-two, 929-947. [ Links ]

Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who can breakup: A great 14-12 months longitudinal examination of black colored lovers and you may white people. Record out of Societal and personal Dating, 19, 179-202. [ Backlinks ]

Orenstein, S. (). This new love formula Fits thinks this has discovered a formula to have governing the online matchmaking business: A scientific strategy to find Mr. or Ms. Best. Providers dos.0 Mag. Retrieved toward regarding [ Website links ]

Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Only the congruent survive – Personality similarities within the partners. Identification and Private Variations, forty five, 533-535. [ Backlinks ]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Partner tastes: Just what characteristics manage group focus inside their quick-term sexual and you may a lot of time-identity close partners? Record off Mindset and Person Sexuality, several, 1-21. [ Backlinks ]

Reis, H. T. (1985). Brand new role of one’s care about on initiation and you can span of social telecommunications. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationship Г¤r CharmDate pГҐ riktigt (pp. 209-231). Ny: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Website links ]